Latest London news, sport & entertainment

Local Weather

Partly Cloudy

Partly Cloudy

max temp: 18°C

min temp: 8°C

Five-day forecast

Security company G4S has not been paid since the middle of July, MPs were told today.

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

Paul Deighton, chief executive of the London Organising Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games (LOCOG) told the Commons Home Affairs Select Committee the firm had not been paid since July 13.

He revealed G4S has been paid £89 to £90million by organisers but the rest is “up for negotiation”.

G4S told organisers on July 11 that it would not be able to provide enough security staff for the Olympics - just over two weeks before the Games started. Members of the Armed Forces and police had to be drafted in at the last minutes to plug the gaps.

Mr Deighton said the whole contract with the company was worth £236m, including a £57m “project management fee”.

This included 15 per cent profit for the company, and the rest was mainly the wages of a team who were in charge of recruiting and training staff.

Committee chairman Keith Vaz asked Mr Deighton: “You have paid £89 to £90m, all public money, and the rest is up for negotiation, which you will have with them?”

Mr Deighton replied: “Yes.”

At best the shortages of G4S staff were 4 per cent and at worst 35 per cent during the Olympics, he told the committee. Nearly two-thirds of venues saw a shortfall of more than 15 per cent, although they were up to capacity during the transition period and the Paralympics.

LOCOG chairman Sebastian Coe told the committee: “It is difficult to look beyond their inability to deliver on the contracted number of security personnel that we were consistently assured by them that they would be able to deliver.”

Charles Farr, Home Office head of security and counter-terrorism, made his first public appearance before the committee.

He said G4S gave no indication that they would struggle to meet the demands of the contract before July 11, and claimed the company “weren’t completely open” with organisers in the lead-up to the Games.

Mr Farr said: “We were given sets of data which gave no indication whatever, even as late as July 1, that there was going to be a problem fulfilling that contract. That data was what G4S relied upon to explain the progress of their programme.”

He said he was told on July 1 that 37,000 people had passed training, of whom 25,000 were security-screened and 21,000 accredited. The requirement was less than 15,000.

Nine thousand people were ready to work by that date, up 2,000 on two weeks before, the committee heard.

Mr Farr said: “The data was clearly misleading at the very least.”

David Taylor-Smith, G4S’s chief operating officer who led its Olympic programme, said the company began giving information to Locog in a different format in May, after concerns about the quality of its data were raised in a report by consultants Deloitte.

G4S chief executive Nick Buckles told the committee that the company was already having problems with numbers on July 3 but he said it was not until the firm checked the situation in detail on July 10 that staff realised they were in serious difficulties.

Mr Taylor-Smith agreed that the debacle was “a serious failure” and apologised for what had happened. He said: “As Nick did last time (he gave evidence to the committee), I of course apologise in particular to the members of the armed services and police who stepped in to assist us.”

Mr Buckles said most of the £90m paid so far had gone on salaries and other costs.

G4S will donate £2.5m to service charities to try to make up for the fact that service personnel had to step in, he told the MPs. He said the firm will make a £50m loss because of the cost of additional police and military personnel and other penalties.

Mr Buckles said: “I’m not going to sit here and say we did a great job. But we delivered a significant portion of that contract and our people did an excellent job and played a major part in delivering these Games. We are planning to take a £50 million loss on this contract.”

Share this article

submit to reddit submit to Fark

Share this article

submit to reddit submit to Fark

0 comments

Latest London news